The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
Several people believe that increasing the fuel price can be a most effective method to handle with internationally environmental issues. From my perspective, I hold a firm belief that other measures should be taken equally into consideration.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that applying higher energy charge can cause various detrimental consequences to individuals as well as the society, which makes it cannot be the most efficient solution for the environmental dilemma. Firstly, there is sufficient evidence to infer that there is exist a tendency of growing demand for fossil fuel in the world, due to globalization and overpopulation. For example, employees and several factories are put in the sophisticated situation due to struggling to reduce their demand on energy, regardless of fields. Secondly, this mode is more likely to put the heavy burden on the shoulders of citizens and the community, followed by a myriad of disadvantageous outcomes, such as increasing debt in the economy.
On the other hand, it cannot be denied that there are a wide range of other measures can contribute to resolving environmental problems. Firstly, utilizing renewable resources such as wind, hydro and solar enegy not only have various advantages results for the environment but also is a cost-effective solution. Furthermore, only by enhancing the public’s awareness about this global issue can the government reach the long-term goal about sustainable environment. For instance, national authorities are able to get each individual involved the international campaign such as the green day or set a habit of sorting the daily garbage.
In conclusion, I am in support of the opinion that besides raising the price of fuel, there are several practical methods can apply to reduce the environmental pollution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 296, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...ficient evidence to infer that there is exist a tendency of growing demand for fossil...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40845070423 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26145304688 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605633802817 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.8807177662 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.636363636 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.2727272727 7.06120827912 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103394370695 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379891127268 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321669997596 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0641382307874 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0058987566358 0.056905535591 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.