Children's education is expensive. In some countries, the government should pay for some of or all of the costs. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages?
In recent years, the question of whether or not the governments should pay for part or full children's education has been receiving a great deal of public attention. although, this assistance is not without disadvantages, the upsides will be far more significant.
There are some drawbacks to this sponsorship. First, since the sustainable development of a nation requires to have many investments in many fields, paying for some or all children's schooling fees will put a burden on national budgets. In fact, the government needs to fund properly for many key areas such as healthcare, economy which implies every citizen should shoulder the responsibility of children's tuition fees. Second, by supporting children's education, either a part or all of the cost, the authority creates unfairness to people who are childless or who live alone. This means that they will feel angry or irritated of knowing part of their money is not spent on their benefits.
Nevertheless, there are a myriad of merits when the government provides financial support to educational sponsorships. First, since children are the future of a country, the government subsidies encourage them to go to school, which guarantees the qualified workforce down the road. Obviously, the greater investment in educating children, the more qualified and talented young generations which a nation reaps many benefits to a sustainable development in the sense. Second, if parents can release the burden from children's schooling fees, it will be a good chance for them to have a good take care of their offsprings. For example, caregivers may have more money to buy clothes, food for their children than before, improving the standard of living as a result.
in conclusion, it is a wise decision when the government is inclined to finance partly or fully for children's tuition fees. notwithstanding some negative impacts are anticipated, by acknowledging the importance of educating children, officers will lead their country to a higher level of growth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
In recent years, the question of whether or not the governments should pay for p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...iving a great deal of public attention. although, this assistance is not without disadva...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation, either a part or all of the cost, the authority creates unfairness to peop...
^^
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
... benefits. Nevertheless, there are a myriad of merits when the government provides ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...the standard of living as a result. in conclusion, it is a wise decision when ...
^^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Notwithstanding
...ly or fully for childrens tuition fees. notwithstanding some negative impacts are anticipated, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30841121495 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04658562819 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570093457944 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7351024688 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.714285714 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273778650792 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091751942318 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558569478299 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172529890218 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335684176849 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.