Children in some parts of the world have less responsibility compared to children in the past. Some people think as a positive change, however, others think of it as a negative. What do you think?
Most beautiful gift a parent can give to their children are the roots of responsibility along with the wings of independence. It has been believed by several world people that in the past there was more responsibility bestowed upon children as compared to now. These change can have two fold effects, but in my opinion, this change has a more negative impact for several reasons as described in the essay.
There is a famous saying, if one wants their children to keep their feets down on the ground, then one should put some responsibility on their shoulders. There is no doubt in the saying. Parents now don't tend to put any kind of social or other responsibility on their child. This makes them lazy and ultimately they will be devoid of knowledge about any new and important things like life lessons. Also, it is proved scientifically that a child, with more responsibility bestowed upon them, does their assignments punctually and perfectly. This will help a child in his adulthood, as a child well trained with responsibilities, will show discipline and ownership in their work.
On the other hand. We know that overuse of a boon is a curse, and this holds true in this case too. Many times it is seen that a child has to bear the burden which is much more compared to what they can handle. This robs a child of their precious childhood. We know from the bedtime stories of our elders, that how they used to do work in their times and how much hardships everybody faced then to become financially strong, at least now that is not the case, and the majority of the world child is able to enjoy their days. If thought in this regards, then this development is a positive one.
It is true that children are bearing less burden nowadays, but this has gone awry. They are now stripped off of the responsibilities completely, which is not at all good. Bestowing some burden on a children's shoulder trains them in very good manner, and makes them competitive for their adulthood. They learn life lessons and can make a society fit and healthy to live in. They will spend their money responsibly and will contribute to a nation's economy.
To conclude my argument, I would say that completely depriving a child off their responsibilities is not positive, A certain amount of responsibility should be there to teach them about the world and life lessons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... is no doubt in the saying. Parents now dont tend to put any kind of social or other...
^^^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... used to do work in their times and how much hardships everybody faced then to becom...
^^^^
Line 5, column 540, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...able to enjoy their days. If thought in this regards, then this development is a pos...
^^^^
Line 7, column 439, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ey responsibly and will contribute to a nations economy. To conclude my argument, I ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, well, as to, at least, kind of, no doubt, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 24.0651302605 220% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1950.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 413.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7215496368 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79460217421 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520581113801 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 5.43587174349 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1103544997 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8571428571 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135352876418 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450617732079 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475406775308 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831961745594 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354702189915 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.