Companies should encourage employees who work in a high position to leave at the age of 55 in order to give opportunities to the new generation. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is a common practice conducted by HR (Human Resources) departments in most western companies to substitute senior staff for younger ones. This policy might be questionable since HR managers favor new ideas and enthusiasm over experience. I, as a recent graduate student, support the practice because it is a natural process of ageing.
Japan management can be considered to be the most efficient and reliable than other types of management. It is unlikely to see a young in a top manager position in Japanese companies since the positions are occupied by experienced senior employees who have passed through many economic crises and accustomed to intense competitive markets. Therefore, Japanese entities such as Toyota, Sony, Mitsubishi, etc. are often found among the world’s top ranked companies. Nevertheless, markets and industries have significantly changed compared to the last century. Nowadays organizations run by young managers ensure niches in industries and successfully compete with the giant companies. This phenomenon is explained with the fact that young top managers are full of new and audacious ideas which contribute in their success.
Most senior ex-employees who used to work in high positions in companies claim that they have left little time to enjoy the life. Top managers tend to resign at their late 60’s or even 70’s after devoting youth and a great majority of time to the companies they worked. Consider the fact that in most countries the lifespan is 75 years, thus, those managers approximately have 5 to 10 years. This time might not be enough for enjoying with ones’ families. Therefore, it would be humane to encourage top managers to retire at age of 55 so they could have more time to devote to their families.
Encouraging employees in high positions to leave at the age of 55 can be beneficial for both the employees and their successors since the seniors can have more time for family, and the successors can bring innovation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more time to devote to their families. Encouraging employees in high positions ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19565217391 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91899199294 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562111801242 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8764583106 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5625 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174342504283 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518441522849 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551665400297 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109101168195 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045564893523 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.