Discussion the reason why people define happiness differently and how to obtain happiness.
In recent years, there have been numerous attempts to define and measure happiness in various contexts and pertaining to a wide range of disciplines. Studies show that each person will define their happiness in different ways. There are a number of reasons behind this point of view and how to people satisfy themselves.
The majority of convincing reasons associated with this phenomenon. Young and elderly people are actually experiencing completely different emotions when they say they are well-being hence generations feel happiness in different ways which are the hugely significant reason. In other words, young people generally further interested in the future and they are better likely to associate happiness with excitement. On the contrary, a higher value is placed on the present by elderly people, therefore, contentment tends to be a greater source of happiness and they become longer likely to associate happiness with peacefulness. A research found that for younger people, about 60 proportion of happiness is based on feelings of excitement whilst 80 percentage of happiness corresponded with levels of contentment by elderly people.
It is undeniable that it seems almost impossible to offer a precise definition of happiness. The bulk of people would agree that there are several basic preconditions to achieving it. However, in some people’s opinion, happiness is not an individual but a collective state as well as it depends on positive, mutually fulfilling, mutually complementing human relationships. Thus, we cannot obtain happiness for ourselves directly, we can only provide it to one another. Notwithstanding, in order to obtain happiness, we need a unique in order to the mutually supportive environment where people commit to trying providing each other with happiness.
In conclusion, age differences are the primarily important for explaining why people have different definitions of happiness. Moreover, occasionally, happiness cannot be achieved on its own, it has to be the exchange between people and people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, in conclusion, as well as, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56230031949 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14894765708 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584664536741 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4231614619 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.066666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385899880113 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113431120897 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594665796412 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21946691707 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393220603102 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.