Do copyright laws limit creativity or reward it? Would society function better without such rules and regulations?
Nowadays, prevailing copyright laws are one of means to restrict someone from using others’ patents, but now its function is being argued. Some believe that those laws didn’t play their part in the society, and wanted to erase them, but there are also groups saying that they are needed. This essay will critically explain whether humans need those regulations or not.
To begin with, they could help us to maintain our work without no one taking it away and make patents out of it. Imagine we have worked a lot, sacrificing both funds and energy, yet seeing our work claimed by a rival. We don’t want that to happen in the first place, so then thoughts began to show up and evolved to the regulations needed. They are strict toward others, and that’s why we would be assured that our discoveries will still remain ours.
On the other hand, they indirectly prohibited youngsters to create innovations. For example, when they are trying to make a music tape, they tend to search for music videos online and edited them and then mixed them up. It’s not wrong actually, but the system said so because they stole others’ belongings and make a video out of it pretending that it’s their original work. Thus, youngsters are less likely to be creative in the sophisticated world.
To recapitulate, copyright shouldn’t be banished from this world, but actions to reduce its area of work is a must if the future generations’ freedom in creating is needed.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, so, still, then, thus, for example, to begin with, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87250996016 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53759528904 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.653386454183 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7380773765 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.916666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0859407827976 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0310767737936 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0295696302879 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.050793184588 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350119759103 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.