Due to increasing world demands for oil and gas energy people need to look for new sources of energy in remote and untouched natural places. Do the advantages of locating these sources outweigh disadvantages of damaging these places?
At present, the world demands for oil and gas energy are considerably escalating progressively, however, individuals should establish new sources of energy in remote and untouched natural destinations. This essay will investigate the benefits of locating these resources, which cannot be outweighed the drawbacks damaging such places.
On the one hand, the first and foremost merit of locating new energy supplements is getting sufficient information about the untouched places of the Earth. As a result of this trend, there will be robust opportunities for preserving the environment. For instance, harmful fumes, which are emitting into the air because of oil and gas resources create numerous issues like climate change and if inhabitants explore unfamiliar places for obtaining energy sources, which will be useful for the environment, this will eradicate lots of problems facing all over the world. Therefore, remote areas can give golden chances to humanity for ascertaining up-to-date data or other beneficial sources.
On the other hand, unknown destinations where will be new sources of energy are extremely dangerous for people. Mainly because nobody knows the dangers of these areas that will create a plethora of unexpected accidents even the risk of death cases. If individuals go to these places, they may damage the species of animals that live there by endeavoring to secure themselves. For example, last year, a group of scientists who went to the North pole in order to investigate the reasons for climate change killed the white bear because of the protection. Furthermore, it is not ordinary work to establish unknown resources.
In conclusion, it is transparent that the advantages of exploring untouched places like getting new information cannot overshadow disadvantages such as death cases and damaging rare species because of the dangerous circumstances in those areas.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51369863014 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98906495225 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585616438356 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4107588339 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.166666667 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376711660289 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11964034911 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914762153198 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226010506186 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0934416048507 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.