Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In a world, there are various languages that bring uniqueness and the country's cultural value. However, minority languages are becoming extinct due to lack of its usage every year. In this rate, majority language will be dominant the world's language. This can be provide the convenience in trade and easy communication, but the countries will not have own historical values. Therefore, I completely disagree with the world to have dominant languages because I believe that, the country's traditional values outweigh the country's globalisation.
By having a common language around the world can lessen the language barriers between countries for the economic growth. In this case, the world can enjoy from globalisation by conducting easy conversations. For example, in India, even though their main official language is Hindi, they adopted the world's common language (English) for the benefits of economic growth in the foreseeable future. Due to this adoption, India's economy has expanded drastically and it is expected to increase continuously. Therefore, it is apparent that without having a language barrier, can achieve the economic growth in the whole world.
In contrast, as the world is becoming familiar with common languages, the uncommon, rarely spoken languages will be extinct. Since the languages are carrying a lot of information such as culture, history and tradition, the disappearance of language can be seen as losing of those data. For example of Australia's and New Zealand's tributes called aboriginals and Maori are facing the threat from being extinction due to their population is getting reduced. In other words, their history, and cultural values are highly likely undervalued and misleading because the validation of such information is impossible to achieve. Therefore, the cultural, historical and traditional value in languages make it unique of the country and these valuable information worth more than that of economical benefits.
The country's own value and historical events are unique to each other. These create the country to be unique and attractive to other people. In the case of South Africa, for instance, after it officially identified their official language as an English, their traditional and historical information became vanished. Nowadays, South Africa has the similar culture and habits of those from Western countries despite its economic growth. Even with the economic growth, it was not significant enough to be noticeable. In other words, this is the one example of a country where adopted of a common language of English in the expectation of economic growth but in fact it failed.
In conclusion, since the country's own uniqueness is derived from the language, it is important to hold on. A language holds various details of information from history, culture and tradition, it can be said that the language is the existence of a country. Therefore, reservation of uncommon languages are more valuable than that of having a globalised language.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
... majority language will be dominant the worlds language. This can be provide the conve...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 776, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ble information worth more than that of economical benefits. The countrys own value and h...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'such as', 'in other words']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.239543726236 0.247107183377 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.131178707224 0.155533422707 84% => OK
Adjectives: 0.133079847909 0.0946595960268 141% => OK
Adverbs: 0.032319391635 0.0501214627716 64% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0342205323194 0.0437548338989 78% => OK
Prepositions: 0.134980988593 0.122226691241 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0380228136882 0.0403226058552 94% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.92220264952 2.80594681477 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0209125475285 0.0326793684256 64% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.110266159696 0.0861772015684 128% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0171102661597 0.021408717616 80% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00190114068441 0.011925033212 16% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3000.0 1933.35771543 155% => OK
No of words: 469.0 316.048096192 148% => OK
Chars per words: 6.39658848614 6.12580529183 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.20517956788 111% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.449893390192 0.374742101984 120% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.358208955224 0.28420135186 126% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.279317697228 0.203846283523 137% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.155650319829 0.137316102897 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92220264952 2.80594681477 104% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.037074148 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460554371002 0.56093040696 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 51.8068364913 60.7387585426 85% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0891783567 149% => OK
Sentence length: 19.5416666667 20.7743622355 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2148183972 49.517814964 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 127.492653851 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5416666667 20.7743622355 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.814263465372 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 55.3625621891 49.1944974215 113% => OK
Elegance: 2.08653846154 1.69124875643 123% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25971690724 0.332605444948 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.136091623838 0.102741220458 132% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0745936468901 0.0668466124924 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.527835800319 0.534860350844 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.129742802352 0.148594505496 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113575785376 0.134430193775 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526738524443 0.0742795772207 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.436831989543 0.324371583561 135% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0597004111275 0.0638462369009 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192364726345 0.228012699653 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726542227687 0.058150111329 125% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.68436873747 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.41683366733 146% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 5.90881763527 169% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.5751503006 194% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 1.9629258517 255% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 10.4468937876 191% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.