A few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the use of others is rapidly declining. Is it a positive or negative development?
In the era of globalization, some languages become dominant across the globe while others are undermined. From my personal perspective, this issue brings both negative and positive influence on an equal measure.
Looking at the bright side, the increasing usage of a few languages offers certain merits for global citizens and the development of the world. One major benefit contributing to this is the eradication of language barriers, which may bring the ease of communication between parties in a conversation as a consequence. Not only does the use of common languages facilitate economic growth such as international trade and export activities, but it also provides unlimited access for higher education and enhances social integration among different communities. For example, thanks to English - the global language, people from several regions can communicate and make friends from any foreign countries in an effortless way.
However, it is likely to have negative impacts since the rapid development of few languages can result in the potential extinction of others. Once a language is at risk of death, there can be no doubt that its associated culture and history would disappear, which will cause a loss of spiritual legacy for the latest generation. Because of that, those people can easily forget their ancestry and origin and the world will also experience the shrinkage of regional languages and cultural diversity at the same time. Therefore, if many minority languages were eliminated, human identity in terms of cultural differences would be threatened seriously and replaced by a characterless world.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that despite the benefits gained from the spread of few common languages during the era of globalization, this trend tends to negatively affect other languages because of the narrowing culture and history.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 701, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effortless way" with adverb for "effortless"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...make friends from any foreign countries in an effortless way. However, it is likely to have negat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47058823529 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00469113997 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650519031142 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.3899645071 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.727272727 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267456454467 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917875831114 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601873867137 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147565915925 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00785237876517 0.056905535591 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.