Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. To what extent do you think is it a positive or negative development?

Essay topics:

Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. To what extent do you think is it a positive or negative development?

It is irrefutable that fossil fuels are the main source of energy in many parts of the world. Governments across continents are likely to make a transition towards renewable energy. In my opinion, it could be seen as a progress in balancing the demand for energy.
Dependence on fossil fuel for worldwide energy supply would cause environmental degradation. It is due to the fact that the burning of fossil fuels releases large amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, which makes a great contribution/directly linked to global warming. Similarly, oil extraction companies frequently disposed of drilling waste into oceans and their transportation activities carry a huge risk of oil leaks and oil spills, which not only kill marine organisms but also poison the food chains of many species living around oil rigs. In contrast, using solar power, for example, is considered an ultimate choice of energy conservation since it has minimal impact on the envoironment.
Excessive consumption of fossil fuel can lead to depletion of natural resources. To begin with, fossil fuels, our primary source of energy, are, on one hand, on the verge of exhaustion since it is non-renewable. Take Germany as an example, a great deal of bountiful oil fields have been tapped and are likely to run out, which leads to oil production stagnation. Therefore, alternative energy sources/ viable renewable energy supplies are undoubtedly a good option to substitute conventional fuel sources due to its abundant supply. For instance, only a tiny fraction of the sun's rays reach the Earth, but those that do provide enough energy to warm the planet and make it hospitable for life.
In conclusion, I believe that the use of other potential energy sources to replace fossil fuel is obviously an important step forward in order to promote sustainable development.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'progress'.
Suggestion: progress
...rgy. In my opinion, it could be seen as a progress in balancing the demand for energy. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ess in balancing the demand for energy. Dependence on fossil fuel for worldwide ...
^^^
Line 4, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l is obviously an important step forward in order to promote sustainable developm...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21140939597 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01942758325 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624161073826 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1661917746 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.461538462 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248652387183 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933901487378 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824133594989 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162798072319 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492518435579 0.056905535591 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.