In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planet to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Our planet has gradually become more difficult to reside in. Some people hold a view that money should be spent on space exploitation to find new dwellings for human. While I agree that this viewpoint is justifiable, I believe that humans should not increase the budget on exploring other planets.
Allocating expenditures in the discovery of extra-terrestrial planets is reasonable to some extent to relieve the pressure from burgeoning world population. As the birth rate in many countries is increasing at an alarming rate, there soon will leave little space for the world inhabitants. Subsequent consequences like depletion of natural resources, contaminated air quality or the spread of contagious diseases resulting from the surge in the population can be effectively tackled if alternatives of changing living places to other planets are discovered. Furthermore, when state officials invest more national finding in space studies, various jobs are created, which would reduce the unemployment rate.
However, it seems to me that financial investments on research for new planets to clonise is not and effective measures. The primary reason is that living conditions in distant planers like Mars are often extreme and unhabitable, which is a task of challenge for people to be able to adapt to such hospitable environment. In addtion, it is absurd to argue that our planet have no room for recovery. There are various beneficial fields in need of investment from national authorities, which can directly affect millions of ordinary lives. If government spent less money on space research, they would be able to ease distressing matters, such as elimination of famines, global warming and population control.
In conlusion, I am of the opinion that efforts should be concentrated on living more sustainably on Earth in spite of pouring more money on discovering another planet to settle down.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...such hospitable environment. In addtion, it is absurd to argue that our planet ha...
^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng more sustainably on Earth in spite of pouring more money on discovering anothe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36454849498 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0453006415 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622073578595 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5370837933 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.384615385 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299736213092 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931708181291 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682322340282 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189349429689 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657880375942 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.