The good way to protect the environment is at the international level.
Despite the fact that the matter of environment does not grab a headline as frequently as other issues in the fast-paced life, it does not mean it is less serious. It is commonly believed that the pragmatic measure to the problems of nature should be taken into account at the worldwide cooperation between a wide range of countries in the world. As far as I am concerned, I side with this statement.
We should recognize that the environmental problems are on the global scale. First of all, most inhabitants survive in the equivalent biosphere and share the same natural resources. In simple terms, if contamination occurs, we will have to suffer from the phenomenon of it all together. Take the Mekong River as an example, due to the river’s upstream is in China and it runs through six other countries, contaminating Mekong River’s flow in China is the facilitator of transporting pollutants to neighbors. Consequently, the indigenous people of those six nations are failed to escape from the interdependence of ecosystem. More importantly, pesticides and toxins used on fields have negatively impacted not merely one but also other countries. The case is true that emitting hazardous gases and dumping toxic materials of some factories have left an enormous range of inevitable outcomes. As a result, the international collaboration is a reliable resolution to deal with this pressing issue.
There is no doubt that exchanging state-of-the-art technology is attributed to the joint effort. To begin with, the underdeveloped countries always pay attention to improve and revitalize their economy by exploiting natural resources rather than preserving surroundings. This action leads to the result that habitats are devastated. For instance, many nations prefer cutting down trees to supply material for logging industry than conserving the forest. As a consequence, a host of habitations of both diurnal and nocturnal animals are demolished. Apart from it, if these impoverished countries attach their significance to environmental protection, they will face an enormous of adversities on an account of the absence of cutting-edge technology. Therefore, the global support, especially from industrialized nations which possess the leading-edge technology, is intensively necessary.
In the light of these facts, the international cooperation among nations around the world is one of the most efficient methods to solve these adverse problems. Furthermore, this effort not merely conserves our natural world but also connects our communities through exchanging technology. We should put it into account as an imperative need before environmental issues become irreversible.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, apart from, for instance, no doubt, as a result, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2289.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 411.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56934306569 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30757805324 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591240875912 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 725.4 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1540798391 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0386250628876 0.244688304435 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00965607595026 0.084324248473 11% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0202026063788 0.0667982634062 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0267277833888 0.151304729494 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02278523726 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.