Nowadays, government funding is still quite limited for academic studies, and some people believe it should be used only for rewarding their top students. The alternative resources, like non-profit charity organizations or private donations, can support all other expenditures. In my view, I am not convinced that this proposal can make a significant difference.
Admittedly, if government funding exclusively targets the students with the best academic performance, it will just benefit for the same group of individuals, which is likely to discourage those who make great efforts or have physical or financial difficulties. In other words, universities are the places where all students are entitled to enjoy equal opportunities for awards and financial endorsement. For example, the University of Toronto uses government funding to award students who demonstrate major progress on grades, although they are not the best marks. Similarly, government funds are also indispensable for the disabled or those from extremely low-income families.
Meanwhile, universities may face overwhelming pressure to seek funding themselves when all government funding is utilized solely for students. Such educational institutions not only have to spend money on attracting more enrolments, but on organizing large fun-raising events to support other critical expenses, including faculty’s salaries, infrastructure maintenance, and research projects. Accordingly, universities may get distracted from their essential responsibility of teaching, and hence compromising their education quality in the long run.
Of course, while some might argue that top students deserve government scholarships for their extraordinary endeavors, determination, and persistence, I still think that universities should find a healthier way of raising funds, wisely balancing various financial resources, and appropriately distributing them, other than restricting government funds only for the best student’s benefits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, hence, if, may, similarly, so, still, while, for example, of course, in my view, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.19784172662 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36558611816 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654676258993 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.1095311076 49.4020404114 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.636363636 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8181818182 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347806000425 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123344154652 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779141533172 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206116699172 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614065560049 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.0946893788 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 50.2224549098 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.98 12.4159519038 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.