Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Every Government wants to provide safer and faster transport services to its public. It is considered as one of the achievements of Government. Now, the question is whether to provide more rail services or more road services. This is a big question in all the developing countries. This essay delves into both the arguments before arriving at a logical conclusion.
To begin with railways, it helps millions of people to travel from one place to another at very low cost. It also helps in trade and services by transferring the goods from one city to another. Secondly, there is less environmental degradation using railways. When we use roads, then there is a high wastage of fuels and it also leads to pollution. Thirdly, the number of road accidents are much higher than rail accidents, which leads to massive deaths. Another reason is as railway tracks are set mostly outside the city which helps in reduction of traffic.
On the flip side of coin, the construction of roads requires less funds as contrast to the construction of rails. For developing or underdeveloped country, it is not possible to spend astronomically. Secondly, the reach of roads is with each town and village of the country. This is not possible with railway tracks. Thirdly, for usage of roads no advance booking is required.
After looking into each and every aspect of an essay, it arises at a rationale conclusion that the Government must consult with their Finance Ministry for consultation of funds and with Development Authorities for planning the town or city map. The Government may also consult with its public. As in commercial cities like Bombay, Delhi, Kolkata and so on railways tracks are more significant and for residential cities, road transport is more important.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun funds is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...oin, the construction of roads requires less funds as contrast to the construction o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04436860068 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85425051998 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552901023891 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.8534085087 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.7894736842 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4210526316 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.10526315789 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126453447037 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406254907674 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470979149771 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729047911489 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017983461873 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.