Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Government should invest on new railways rather than build new roads. I strongly agree.
To begin with, Railways have fewer impacts on environment than roads. For instance, if a train work with its full capacity, it would consume less energy than cars for each passenger. With this in mind, railways can transport the same number of people by using less energy and fewer environmental effects.
Secondly, Railways have higher rate of safety than roads. Trains move on specific railway and all of them are monitored by experts which means that the probability of crashing two trains is almost zero. On the other side, crashing two cars is inevitable and the large number of people die on roads every day. Despite attempts on building safer vehicles and driving acts which gets updated frequently, police is not able to prevent the car accidents on roads.
Lastly, people can easily do their daily routines when they are in a train. It is undoubtedly a very important feature. Reading books, sleeping, playing games and doing job remotely, for example, are all advantages that make people choose traveling by train. They can also walk along the corridors and prevent to get backache.
In conclusion, train has many advantages which outweigh road’s benefits. Governments should encourage people to use railway mode by virtue of invest money on its infrastructures and decrease the price of its tickets. Government also would be benefited from that. If Government puts railways first in its priorities, it does not need to spend much money to mitigate environmental issues or accommodate medical care for people who are injured in car accidents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 239, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to travel'.
Suggestion: to travel
... all advantages that make people choose traveling by train. They can also walk along the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ople who are injured in car accidents.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14126394052 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65730877419 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620817843866 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.1711874085 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3529411765 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8235294118 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219644668407 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640348915915 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589173183098 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12277951159 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622322310335 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.