Transportation is the veins of any country, sophisticated transportation facilities and road systems are the symbols of a country's economic development and wealth. Some people argue that the authorities should spend their money on railways rather than roads, i completely disagree with this statement.
Firstly, constructing a large network of railway lines cost billion of dollars to any government, with that same amount they can build almost thrice length of road network system. Furthermore, geographical factors does not affect when building roads, while it is very difficult to construct a rail road in areas like hilly parts of the nation. Moreover, logistics is an another important factor, rail transportation is only ideal when people want to move huge quantity of items to a long distance. For shorter distances and small payloads people often rely on roads.
Secondly, climatic factors also affect smooth running of trains. There are areas which are under heavy snow or rain around the year, in such bad weather conditions train movements often get more disturbed than vehicle traffic on the roads. In addition maintenance of railway tracks and trains will be a huge financial burden for the people who ever own it, whether it's owned by public or private. Whereas, roads once constructed using modern techniques often last for a fair amount of time without any serious maintenance works. On top of that governments can actually raise money from well constructed roads in the form of tolls and traffic penalties.
To recapitulate, it is evident that governments should spend their money on roads rather than railways, because it has lot of advantages than rail networks both in economic and social terms.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...g a large network of railway lines cost billion of dollars to any government, with that...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'an important' or 'another important'.
Suggestion: an important; another important
...s of the nation. Moreover, logistics is an another important factor, rail transportation is only ide...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...d than vehicle traffic on the roads. In addition maintenance of railway tracks and train...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, in addition, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27272727273 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79256628324 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650909090909 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6891996126 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.833333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222435515751 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812300724189 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133749431223 0.0667982634062 200% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163506067116 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107338715849 0.056905535591 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.