The line chart depicts the information regarding the fluctuations in new born rates of China and USA for a span of 8 decades, from 1920 to 2000.
It is clear from the data that, during the initial period of 1920's the birth rate of China and USA were almost the same, showed a mere difference of 2% and a slow upward trend. But after the 5 yers of time, in 1925 both nations birth rate dipped to it's original figure of 1920 (10% and 12% respectively). In 1925, both regime's figures showed an increasing trend again. Whereas, China's new born rate reached not so high as figure of 15% in 1935.
From 1935 to 1950, China and USA figures reflected some fluctuations and reached its all time high proportion of 20% and 15% respectively. China's figures faced a steep decline in the year 1955 by more than below half percentage of previous recorded numbers and continued this trend till the year 2000. There it touched almost the rock bottom point of 2%. While, USA also showed the same downward trend but not that much as china. USA figures at the end of the the millennium was 7%.
In conclusion, Both countries started off with an increasing trend and reached their high percentages during the year of 1950.
At the same time their new born rates reduced drastically over the period of 80 years of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...gures showed an increasing trend again. Whereas, Chinas new born rate reached not so hi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 457, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...uch as china. USA figures at the end of the the millennium was 7%. In conclusion, Bo...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 457, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...uch as china. USA figures at the end of the the millennium was 7%. In conclusion, Bo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, whereas, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1074.0 1615.20841683 66% => OK
No of words: 235.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57021276596 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39747112881 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565957446809 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 506.74238477 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9009248108 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126548006979 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495798359816 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401493850168 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0747788019146 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477341706726 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 50.2224549098 154% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 12.4159519038 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 78.4519038076 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.