With the increasing demand for energy sources such as oil and gas should people looking for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched places Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas
The deserted and secluded districts are facing the possibility of being searched for sources of fossil fuels as now that the world is demanding more and more energy sources. Despite some obvious advantages of this trend, I would argue that these are outweighed by the disadvantages.
On the one hand, there are two major benefits when the exploitation of energy sources in remote areas, which is a fulfillment of demand and social development. Regarding the former, there will be a solution to the global increase in using gas and oil problem. isolated places are generally undiscovered and enriched with hidden sources such as fossil fuel, and searching for them means there will be an assurance of need satisfying in energy using for the world in the near future. Following the demand fulfillment, the amount of exploited sources in those areas will actually be a foundation for people to develop new advances in life. As a matter of fact, delays in improving and upgrading technology due to the shortage of energy sources earlier will finally be gotten back on track, life quality will expect huge development.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that the drawbacks are more significant than such advantages since the consequence will not only come off to the environment but also the humanity itself. One of the most noticeable drawbacks is the unavoidable detrimental impacts on the ecosystem. Energy sources are chiefly hidden underground, meaning exploitation of these minerals can leave long-lasting damage to the surrounding. Mass destruction will eventually happen to the environment and unintentionally result in the loss of natural habitat. Once the exploitation of energy takes place, animals and humans are second to suffer in the aftermath of environmental devastation. The number of endangered species will experience a dramatic rise as a result of losing their habitat to contamination as well as the mankind especially later generations, in fact, will suffer the backward evolution with severe health problems or declining life expectancy.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the disadvantages of the attempt to exploit energy sources in untouched places are more significant than the advantages considering the huge potential threat it holds against the environment in general and the inhabitants in particular.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Isolated
... increase in using gas and oil problem. isolated places are generally undiscovered and e...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 831, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e quality will expect huge development. On the other hand, I strongly believe th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, if, regarding, second, so, well, in conclusion, in fact, in general, in particular, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34324324324 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05874908189 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554054054054 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.4709153965 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.214285714 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2857142857 7.06120827912 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298611391162 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888487468934 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604771801251 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163590322122 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709875005426 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Isolated
... increase in using gas and oil problem. isolated places are generally undiscovered and e...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 831, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e quality will expect huge development. On the other hand, I strongly believe th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, if, regarding, second, so, well, in conclusion, in fact, in general, in particular, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34324324324 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05874908189 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554054054054 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.4709153965 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.214285714 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2857142857 7.06120827912 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298611391162 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888487468934 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604771801251 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163590322122 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709875005426 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.