Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
Urbanization is one of the sectors of modern world which leads to traffic jam and air pollution. Rising the petroleum price is the most shallow solutions for such problems. The alternatives will discuss on this essay.
Living in a calm and clean cities is our basic rights as a human. Unfortunately, governers do not pay much attention to this and they want to solve the problems such as traffic congestions and air pollution by inefficient solutions like rising the petroleum price. Indeed, not only this is not helpful, but also this is useless. Because, the researches illustrate that it is temporary effective and after a while all things go back to normal and people pay that certain price finally. So, instead of that government should pass the law to restrict car usage on city centres.
Furtheremore, it should be the schools first priority to teach children use the public transportation system. To be precise, children are the next generation and if they do respect to their hometown now, they will be a confident and quite impressive leader of their own lives. Also, it is the governments responsibility to prepare and upgrade the public transportation to the easily accessible ones and also being affordable for all social classes.
In conclusion, living in a modern worlds would bring up some issues such as air pollution and traffic jam. Facing these problems require a basic resolution like vehicle restrictions, culture buildings and upgrading public transportation system instead of the superficial ones like rising the petroleum price.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...der of their own lives. Also, it is the governments responsibility to prepare and upgrade t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 35, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'world'?
Suggestion: world
...ses. In conclusion, living in a modern worlds would bring up some issues such as air ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ones like rising the petroleum price.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, so, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16996047431 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95332307787 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592885375494 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4996409478 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.615384615 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.091039681342 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0302059043976 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400239014614 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0570705308438 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267831459953 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.