Innovation is often driven by the pursuit of profit and economic growth. However, some argue that it should prioritize addressing social and environmental issues.
Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
People have sparked a heated controversy over the objective of technological breakthroughs. While ones highlight the importance of financial abundance, I believe that innovations should put an emphasis on social and ecological obstacles.
On the one hand, technological advancements are believed to mainly serve economic growth due to a number of reasons. To begin with, it is widely witnessed that the majority of innovations are currently yielded as a result of a massive investment from enterprises. Therefore, only when they bring about a financially adequate outcome can research be maintained; otherwise, it can be deemed as a squander of resources, and may lead to bankruptcy. In addition, even when innovations are fueled by public sectors, profit should also not be overlooked. Specifically, there are always scores of issues high on the agenda, so policy makers tend to allocate the limited resources to aspects whose benefits are tangible and measurable.
On the other hand, despite the significance of profit, it seems to me that social and environmental issues should be the principal drive for scientific explorations. Firstly, while economic growth merely ensures a materialistic fulfillment, societal and ecological stability are recognised to sustain a multifaceted wellbeing, as we see in positive effects of pollution alleviation on public health. Thus, any efforts to amplify abundance may be futile if the surrounding community and ecosystem become irreversibly inhabitable, since profit and money may fail to compensate for their damage. Secondly, it is also tackling social and environmental issues that enable innovations to create profits. For example, a recent study indicated that a reduced carbon footprint has been one of the criteria consumers take into account when they purchase a new vehicle, accompanied by a phenomenal growth of environmentally friendly products.
Briefly, although economic benefits play a remarkable role in the search for new technological solutions, I opine that their importance cannot overwhelm that of social and environmental significance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ntained; otherwise, it can be deemed as a squander of resources, and may lead to bankruptc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70158730159 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33474799913 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622222222222 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0507823627 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.153846154 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2307692308 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06120827912 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174499563085 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061532306613 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048593091597 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966435519648 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344685766931 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.