International community must ensure that all countries reduce the consumption of fossil fuels such as gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Latterly, the overuse of fossil fuels is assumed to wreak havoc on several aspects of our lives, notwithstanding their particular contribution to economic prosperity. Hence, an international board is proposed to be established, aiming to impose legal limits on non-renewable power. I am convinced that this movement should be implemented.
It is an indisputable fact that fossil fuels are at the expense of environmental contamination. In fact, combustion is inevitable to generate energy, which catastrophically exacerbates air pollution through smoke and emissions. Burning coal might perfectly exemplify this situation. More specifically, toxic compounds such as sulfur dioxide or heavy metals are ascribed to this process, which is attributable to acid rain and soil degradation. Additionally, the destruction of wildlife habitats, as well as the rise in sea level, are repercussions of fossil fuel operations, bearing testimony to the alarming rate of conventional fuel consumption.
Another reason why this issue needs addressing is rooted in the fact that nonrenewable fuels are hazardous and result in unexpected accidents. As mentioned, energy stored in fossil fuels is released via combusting. Those steps frequently take place in censored processing stations; nonetheless, may spell trouble for manual workers due to the flammable nature of the fuel. For instance, the largest oil spill in the world in 2010 caused a colossal number of deaths among the United States blue-collars as susceptible oil drilling rigs exploded accidentally. Thus, the utilization of fossil fuels ought to be minimized and, instead, authorities should move towards sustainable development.
In conclusion, the decline in excessive usage of non-renewable fuels is rational by virtue of the pollution and riskiness threatening mankind. I believe that ceaseless endeavors had better take steps on a global basis to mitigate the problems stemming from fossil fuels.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, nonetheless, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75517241379 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34212653116 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679310344828 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9421316037 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.266666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136980162265 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0409043573648 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0291474119019 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0735278083437 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229173595576 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.84 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, nonetheless, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75517241379 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34212653116 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679310344828 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9421316037 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.266666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136980162265 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0409043573648 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0291474119019 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0735278083437 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229173595576 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.84 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.