There is a global debate surrounding the issue of international travel in this era. Some people assert that this phenomenon contribute to benefits to visitor and destination countries simultaneously. In my personal view, international travel would not only result in positive consequences regarding cultural outcomes for travelers, but it would lead to economic improvement in visited lands.
On the one hand, it is widely announced by sociologist that people could be affected directly by others nations culture. Inhabitants of some so called third world countries annually travel or immigrate to modern and sophisticated countries and spontaneously take advantage of their superior life style and cultural criteria. For example, Canada is one of the prominent nations with respect to dramatic low level of crime and wrongdoings. So, people from all over this planet commute there and when they come back to their homelands they inject those positive effects to the core of their communities. On the flip side, human beings in turn could resemble the unethical points that would not conclude in improvement in the perspective of community life.
On the other hand, nowadays tourism industry is well-known for the major sources of employment. From services, accommodation to souvenir sales contribute to immense gain for the touristic countries. For instance, the dominant sources of living and income in nations such as Bahamas, Brazil, Jamaica, Argentina and so on are through the tourist to their countries. Of course, camping or visiting in the nature, tourist may bring about some hazardous results, although by employing smart management, it could be handled.
To sum up, in my point of view, oversea travel would readily lead to economic progress and boost to touristic nations, similarly, they can take lesson from positive points of people culture of visited countries. Although there might be some detrimental effects on countries by visitors, its privileges outweigh the downside.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, regarding, similarly, so, third, well, for example, for instance, of course, such as, to sum up, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48867313916 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93622581949 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582524271845 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8953350043 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.142857143 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119272219444 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404429052727 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576233649215 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0754122592175 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493548353922 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.