It is evident that modern technologies change human life significantly. The Internet is one of the biggest benefits of this change that provides mankind with endless information, proper communication, and entertainment. Therefore, a considerable number of people think that the internet can replace the information about lifestyle, culture, and traditions of local nations that we gain during travel that I partially disagree with.
To start off with, nowadays, technology improves extremely fast and unpredictably. It creates a lot of opportunities for mankind. People can reach any information with the help of search engines such as Google, Yandex, Yahoo. You can watch HD videos, interesting pictures, or just read the detailed verbal information on different websites that the engine finds about what you searched for. Therefore, people do not have to travel to other parts of the world to get information about other folks’ customs and lifestyles.
On the other hand, even such developed technology cannot deliver the feelings. Seeing the lifestyle of the other nations with your own eyes, feeling the atmosphere, experiencing the hard or easy practices at first hand are the benefits of the journey that Videos on the YouTube, which is the biggest video sharing platform, or the words on the Wikipedia, which is the biggest online encyclopedia, are not able to provide. Additionally, there is no proper internet connection or equipment in some countries. Therefore, search on the internet is not the option for them.
To conclude, taking into consideration the lack of proper Internet connection in some countries and feelings that trips make you sense, I would partially disagree with the idea that there is not a need for travelling to learn local customs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 521, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut other folks’ customs and lifestyles. On the other hand, even such developed t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35483870968 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00615795497 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584229390681 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.4631888469 49.4020404114 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.923076923 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176562528949 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588976073158 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441115449057 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109724762689 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365114175605 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.