It is difficult for people in the cities to get enough physical exercise. What are the causes and solutions
Sedentary lifestyle stemming from insufficient physical exercise has been highlighted as an emerging issue, escaping broader public attention due to its detrimental impacts. Given that this pattern could be attributed to many social factors, identifying the reasons behind could be the key to finding the solutions.
There are many reasons why individuals ignore physical exercise. First, In order to climb the promotion ladders, many workers choose to focus most of their time and effort on careers. This work dedication and commitment can shorten their time for recreational activities, especially those for physical exercise. Second, Since Urban areas are invariably associated with many technological advancements, serving the needs of people, technology dependence could likely ensue. This could culminate in the emergence of citizens’ sedentary lifestyle, eroding their will to do exercise as well.
However, official authorities could undertake some initiatives to combat this problem. First, the legislation of shorting working hours should be enacted. It is implied that if people can return home earlier, their spare time for personal activities especially those for promoting stamina and physique will boost remarkably. In addition, The capital investments into the installation of sports facilities in public places should be conducted by official authorities. This will act as an incentive for people doing more physical exercise, facilitating their health stability.
In conclusion, given that this pattern could result from work dedication and technological development. , By enacting laws reducing working hours and funding the construction of sports facilities alone could get the problem addressed considerably.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...dication and technological development. , By enacting laws reducing working hours...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, well, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.00803212851 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04151541176 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.642570281124 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5206302605 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.857142857 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7857142857 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129532103787 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477726142564 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669545663085 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722509392126 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466226971407 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 50.2224549098 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.28 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.