It is difficult for people living in the city to get enough physical exercise. Why is this the case? What can be done to solve the problem?
It has been witnessed that urban residents are currently facing an austerity of time for physical activities. Two major reasons stand out as responsible for this obstacle, which can be mitigated by several feasible solutions.
To begin with, a lack of exercise among city dwellers can be attributed to two main contributing factors. Regarding to labors, it is the pressure of making a living that deters people from physical activities. In fact, over the past few decades, white collars have had to deal with an increasingly heavy workload, which inevitably makes them stuck behind their desks and prioritize paper works over leisure activities, including taking up sports or work out at the gym. Regarding to children and pensioners, the reason stemming from lacking sporting infrastructures stays at the forefront. Specifically, playgrounds, parks and stadiums have been demolished to make way for urbanization in cities, and this is believed to restrain citizens from physical pastime because of their declining free access.
However, there are several measures that can be proposed to tackle the aforementioned challenge. Firstly, such policies as flexible working hours and job-share should be adopted. In particular, not only do they prevent employees from being snowed by paper works but also help them maintain a work-life balance, in which they will be provided with sufficient time for physical diversions. Secondly, the authority should also prioritize its expenditure on installing sporting equipments and offering free fitness lessons at public places. Indeed, if these services become ubiquitous in urban area, city residents are expected to find it easier to approach exercise options, which can result in a higher frequency of workouts.
In brief, only by efforts of both companies and the government will urban citizens take exercise on a more regular basis.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, in brief, in fact, in particular, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50859106529 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90370889927 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656357388316 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7263786535 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.307692308 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164222060675 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606442451575 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474950134814 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.093261033494 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562939449566 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.