It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There is a belief that implies that people have some inborn talents which lead them to be professional in certain fields. However, others assert that any person can reach the same level by virtue of being taught. In my opinion, being taught outweighs congenital features in the way of reaching high levels in any field.
On the one hand, each person have some talents at doing something. In this regard, people potentially have some advantages in certain fields which help them to be improved faster and easier than others. Among football player, for instance, some players practice less but their performances are as well as others or even better. For example, although Ronaldo clearly practice harder in comparison with Messi, he has got fewer golden balls. Moreover, some musicians were born with outstanding talents which made them able to distinguish all notes and rhythms.
On the other hand, people cannot flourish their talents without exercising and practicing. There are lots of people who are gifted at football for example, but they do not spend their time on that. So, they are not able to be professional and famous athlete. Ronaldo, for example, becomes one the most famous football players in the world, while many others who had a talent in this field has failed to gain such a similar achievement.
In conclusion, although talents play a significant role in any field, practicing and exercising are more important and they would be the intrinsic part of success. There are many cases who reached the peak without any specific talent but there is not any case who succeeded without practicing and working.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03703703704 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51219249086 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585185185185 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7229717835 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1428571429 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258926657156 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902442764808 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340547483729 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153702861643 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498127442662 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.