Nowadays, the expenditure people need to spend on travelling abroad is lower and it is much easier to go to another country with the help of modern transport such as airplanes. I think this is a positive development.
There are tremendous advantages of this trend. For one thing, affordable and convenient trips to another country promote international tourism, which broaden travellers’ horizons. For example, it is the ever-decreasing price of airline tickets in China that has encouraged more Chinese people to travel abroad, getting them exposed to diverse customs, beliefs and behaviours. This could greatly expand visitors’ views. For another, tourism development has economic benefits to the arrived country. If travelling overseas becomes easy and affordable, there would be a surge of demand for associated products and services such as accommodation and souvenirs in the place that people visit, creating revenues for local companies. This contributes to the thriving of local economic development.
However, this trend also put some threats to the arrived country. Environment and ecosystem of local areas might be impaired if the amount of visitors is excessive. For example, without the ever-increasing visitors in the preserves in China, the birds, fish and other species would not have faced the risk of losing their habitats. However, this concern can be significantly reduced by reasonable regulations such as setting the amount limit for visitors.
The above analysis suggests that although there is a risk to the local area’s environment and ecosystem, the surge of tourism development stimulated by convenient transport and price-dropped airline tickets can generate loads of benefits to both local people and visitors.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, for example, i think, such as, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63909774436 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12431121925 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586466165414 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.2771028185 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.142857143 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147533970403 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482732161001 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433054976187 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856693002164 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480585156808 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.