It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behaviour to children?
One momentous stage in a child’s growth is certainly the development of a conscience, which is linked to tell right from wrong. Hence, a contentious dispute has been provoked over whether retribution is essential for children to comprehend this distinction. In my dissenting opinion, this paradigm deems to be unavailing, but there are other ways that could be effectual.
To begin with, sanctions on children at an early age is morally wrong. This is because it could lead to serious repercussion. One of these counterproductive effects is the feeling of repression which conduces to aggression. For example, when these children encounter a challenge, the first demeanour they exhibit is hostility. By seeking corporal retribution, young children will most probably have a predilection toward solitude as they are afraid of physical punishment resulting in lacking social skills.
Nonetheless, although the notion of chastising seems to be the sole means to learn the difference between right and wrong, the education of principles of ethics could be efficacious. To illustrate, parents should earn their children as friends, so that they can teach them about moral values whereas they should discourage them from wrong behaviours, thereby apprehending what is right and wrong. Furthermore, withdrawal of privileges as consequences of unacceptable attitude can be an optimal approach as well.
In conclusion, my firm conviction is that penalizing young children is an erroneous tendency which has adverse impacts, yet to teach them the difference between right and wrong, they should know the implications of virtue ethics and undesirable actions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e other ways that could be effectual. To begin with, sanctions on children at ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t resulting in lacking social skills. Nonetheless, although the notion of chas...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e can be an optimal approach as well. In conclusion, my firm conviction is tha...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, if, nonetheless, so, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59683794466 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1816438712 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628458498024 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6428258672 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292458951315 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885588314313 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624234955569 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153662129643 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024731311498 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.