It is more important for a building to serve a purpose than to look beautiful. Architects shouldn't worry about producing building as a work of art. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

It is more important for a building to serve a purpose than to look beautiful. Architects shouldn't worry about producing building as a work of art. Do you agree or disagree?

It is true that building should be more utilitarian than beautiful. However, I disagree that architects should not make efforts about making artistic building. I believe that today's architects have the expertise and the resources to design buildings which are both- beautiful and useful

A good building should satisfy the three principle of durability, utility and beauty. It should stand up robustly and remain in good condition. It should be be useful and function well for the people using it. It should delight people and raise their spirits. A good architect should strive to fulfil each of these three attributes as well as possible.

To begin with, the burgeoning population and the scarcity of land today have raised the debate whether the buildings of today should only be useful and not beautiful. However, the skyscrapers of today are the answers to both these hindrance of economy. They accommodate a lot of people in the least amount of space and these skyscrapers are architectural marvel in terms of beauty.

Secondly, the natural resources are limited and it is need of the hour to make energy efficient building. For example, using solar panels and other energy saving measures are the need of the day. Today's architect have been successful in designing aesthetically appealing solar panels which need less space. The climate change that are taking place because of global warming need less air conditioning and yet remain cool.

To summarise, it is commendable for architects to understand function, and aesthetics both. It is big responsibility to have building which are both useful and beautiful and architects of today have the capability to do so.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: be
...and remain in good condition. It should be be useful and function well for the people...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'been'?
Suggestion: been
... remain in good condition. It should be be useful and function well for the people...
^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... function well for the people using it. It should delight people and raise their s...
^^
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this hindrance' or 'these hindrances'?
Suggestion: this hindrance; these hindrances
...rapers of today are the answers to both these hindrance of economy. They accommodate a lot of p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, as well as, it is true, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19852941176 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7688095327 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507352941176 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9221345209 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.375 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147595089584 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052404363288 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618251415447 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970404512012 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750002153662 0.056905535591 132% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.