The knowledge was stored in books in the past. Today knowledge are stored on the internet. Do the Advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages
In recent decades, the proliferation of the internet and the development of technology has been expediting the digitalization of knowledge materials including books. Although digital documents would be able to bring more benefits than the physical ones, the existence of traditional books itself is still critical.
It is evident that the knowledge archived on the internet would be advantageous in several aspects. In the past, in order to store the knowledge and expertise in reading materials, the government or institutions had to construct buildings used for stocking books and recruit a number of employees to manage these buildings, which occupied the major resources of the organizations. Therefore, with the advancement of technology, the knowledge can be stored in the digital books without wasting too much resources. In addition, there is the fact that books are inherently made from wood, resulting in the deforestation for manufacturing paper. Consequently, online books would save thousands of tons of lumber as well as enhance the consciousness of protecting the environment from book users.
There is another appealing advantage of stored knowledge online. It will be easier to constitute the reading community worldwide, people globally could connect one another to exchange and discuss books’ contents conveniently thanks to the internet. However, the existence of physical books still plays an important role in archiving knowledge, libraries in which traditional books are kept is not only the place to store human knowledge but also the symbol of the culture of nations.
In conclusion, digital books have become steadily prevalent in this technological era, carrying a huge benefit for readers and reducing the resources put on conventional books. Nevertheless, knowledge in the physical books must be simultaneously maintained and preserved as the heritage for future generations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 498, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...n the digital books without wasting too much resources. In addition, there is the fa...
^^^^
Line 3, column 793, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecting the environment from book users. There is another appealing advantage of ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to exchange and discuss books’ contents conveniently thanks to the internet. How...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66666666667 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1920280716 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597222222222 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2028456392 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320830040987 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124087627182 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801235076307 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181620614378 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700599750433 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.