The line graph below shows oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006.
The line graph elucidates information about the consumption of petrol and it's producing quantity in China, over 24 years from 1982 to 2006, measured in millions of barrels each day.
Overall, oil consumption has gradually escalated after a continuous steady and the amount of fuel-producing has also made a little increase rather than the past in China in this period.
More specifically, Chinese citizens were consuming only 2 million barrels per day in 1982 and this measure preserved and remained constant until 1990, approximately 3 years, however, the utilization of petrol progressively escalated and achieved a peak from 1990 until 2006, when the barrels' quantity came over 6 million every day.
Moreover, China had just 2 million petrol barrels at the beginning of the period which was 1982 and this quantity raised to 3 million in 1986, unfortunately, from this year to 1994, during the 8-years period, this amount remained steady and from the next years, the number of barrels has merely risen, subsequently, came to a half millions in 2006.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: IT_IS[7]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ion about the consumption of petrol and its producing quantity in China, over 24 ye...
^^^
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'barrels'' or 'barrel's'?
Suggestion: barrels'; barrel's
...d a peak from 1990 until 2006, when the barrels quantity came over 6 million every day....
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 295, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
... years, the number of barrels is merely rose, subsequently, came to a half millions ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 1615.20841683 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 171.0 315.596192385 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20467836257 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 4.20363070211 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85970293782 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 176.041082164 58% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59649122807 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 506.74238477 51% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 16.0721442886 25% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 20.2975951904 207% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.9434891444 49.4020404114 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 222.5 106.682146367 209% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 42.75 20.7667163134 206% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15935619245 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116489248373 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078302811454 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116489248373 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078302811454 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.4 13.0946893788 186% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.31 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.3001002004 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.77 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 78.4519038076 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.1190380762 186% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.