There is a no denying fact that the phenomenon of urban development is omnipresent across the globe due to its paramount importance. One school of thought opines that it is worth, however, others consider that it is worthless and a couple of problems also occur because of the same. Although, this has plethora of merits, yet numerous demerits are also there which will elaborated in upcoming paragraphs.
Initiating with the best possible benefits, the most significant reason is that, it is inevitable to plan and develop the infrastructure facilities particularly in cities because of increase in population and moreover, convenient and comfortable places are necessary for offices, schools, homes and shops. To cite an example, Dubai Government has recently inaugurated the Palm City for high class people to enjoy their life with all amenities. As a result, citizens do not want to look the alternatives in any other country to enjoy their life especially for retirees and business people.
On the paradoxical side, there are many draw backs as well, first and foremost is forests and greeneries have wiped out from some locations because of city planners, in India, New Delhi is the best example. Due to that it is impossible to survive in Delhi especially in winter season because of smoggy weather. Secondly, amusement parks and trees are crucial to balance the climatic conditions, if it can plan better urban planners could have the most beneficial for nations and economy as well. For instance, in the light of the announcement from the Suadi Government, they have already started to build a carbon neutral city consequently, people understand the effects of methane emissions and urbanization.
To conclude, this is a mixed bag, this topic has many positive benefits and the negative points of this notion may not be underestimated.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1872909699 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91363666977 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622073578595 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.8193125166 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.0 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1818181818 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3636363636 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1931212886 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594974969338 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327731833121 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969801374323 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287665724722 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.