Many believe that using video cameras helps to prevent crimes while others strongly disagree with that opinion because they afraid of violating the human rights of freedom. I think that installing video in public places have both positive and negative factors in equal measure.
On the one hand, to use surveillance cameras will help to reduce crime commitments such as burglary, robbery, arson,... Furthermore, if you are robbed, it will be easier for the policemen to contract your previous routes and caught the robber as soon as possible. Besides its function to investigate the crime did happen, it can also prevent all risky situations which are not even occurred. Especially when it came to the possibility of terrorists attack, countless lives will be saved due to the existence of public cameras.
On the other hand, people will be infringed upon their private images and that is a violation of privacy. Or even worse, some people or organizations will make use of these images, videos to get your money or threaten you for personal reasons. This will lead to resentment and worry among the multitude.
In conclusion, the benefits we gain from installing cameras in public places is outweighed the negative consequences. The safety of people should be considered the most important factor among those questions related to human rights.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: I_AFRAID[2]
Message: You miss the verb here. You should rather write: 'they're afraid'.
Suggestion: they're afraid
...ngly disagree with that opinion because they afraid of violating the human rights of freedo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 116, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...itments such as burglary, robbery, arson,... Furthermore, if you are robbed, it wi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, so, while, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 219.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16438356164 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6897574124 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.9747356546 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.818181818 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234846868319 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780886920674 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534148828352 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135813538395 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360832257861 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.