In many countries, old or traditional languages are dying out or being forgotten, especially by younger people. Is this an acceptable development which occurs inevitably, or is it something which we should try to prevent?

There is a widely-held concern that new generation tends to forget about their mother tongue. The idea provokes strong argumets, which I will consider here.

On the one hand, it might be said that young people see no point in sticking to traditional tongues , which may range from less-rising usage in daily life to long-term impact of international languages. Examples can be seen in central Asian countries, where cultural norms of mother tongue handed down from one generation to another are dying these due to the widespread popularity of foreighn langueages such as English and Chinese. Although residents are not forced to learn international language, in many essential appointments, English is primare media of negotiation, rather than traditional languages. This means that the proficiency in any international languages would perhaps allow young generation to climb the career ladder and become well-known individual in the future.

The other side of this debate is that traditional languages may bring many benefits for youth as well as we need to prevent the tendency of their extincion. This is because mother tongue is an integral part of our inheritance from the ancestors, which indicates each country's distinction from others and appears to the main media of interaction between residents. A second point is that a lanuage is closely connected with cultural traditions including rituals,parades and ceremonies, which transmitted from generations. This means that knowing your traditional language is a dity of each person and the extinction may would deteriorate our folklore and the fabric of society. However, learning a laguage should consider starting at an early age, rather than the adulthood because chidlren are able to assimilate new material much more quicker than adults.

To conclude, it appears that aim of these traditional languages is admirable for young people because of the strong coonection with their traditions and heritage. A longer- term and more thoughtful programmes is surely needed

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...point in sticking to traditional tongues , which may range from less-rising usage ...
^^
Line 5, column 461, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , parades
...th cultural traditions including rituals,parades and ceremonies, which transmitted from ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 832, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'quicker' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: quicker
...re able to assimilate new material much more quicker than adults. To conclude, it appears...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, second, so, well, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46031746032 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97678353023 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596825396825 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3256848559 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.307692308 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2307692308 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197481530773 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628388491052 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038011843738 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101128102043 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528788040603 0.056905535591 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.