Many countries use fossil fuels such as coal or oil as the main sources of energy. However, in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged.
Do you think this a positive or negative development?
As a result of some environmental problems which have resulted from dependence on fossil fuels, some countries have invested in alternative energy sources. Although there are some disadvantages in this new approach, I wholehearted believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks.
On the one hand, there are certainly some negative consequences in increasing reliance on alternative energy sources. Perhaps the main concern is the issue of safety. Nuclear power is always criticized for its potential to pollute environment. The accidental explosion at Fukushima Daiichi in Japan always reminds the public of the dangers of nuclear plants. The poisonous and radioactive emission from the disaster not only killed a lot of people, but also left cancer death for the next generations. Another energy source, wind power, is criticized for causing noise pollution. It also damages the landscape when wind farms are installed.
On the other hand, alternative energy sources help us to protect our planet because they are environmentally friendly. Firstly, unlike the burning of fossil fuels, almost all the alternative energy sources produce little or no waste such as carbon dioxide or other chemical pollutants. Therefore, they are eco-friendly and do not contribute to air pollution. Secondly, solar and wind power are both renewable sources of energy. Instead of depending on fossil fuels which are becoming exhausted, a use of renewable energy will guarantee a boundless supple of energy for the future generations.
In conclusion, despite the safety concern and other impacts, it is worth supporting the use of alternative energy sources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...es in this new approach, I wholehearted believe that the benefits outweigh the drawback...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54761904762 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97676184992 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603174603175 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.699160026 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2559039418 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692616310826 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557932027952 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140413469094 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625232814192 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.