Undoubtedly, these days economy plays an immense role in international political scene of the nations. Accordingly, heads of the countries firmly claim that boost to economy of the countries is the most vital objective. On the flip side, some people persistently assert that there are various number of the matters that are urgent to the countries. To me, the idea of the latter party seems more appealing, and in this essay I am going to delve deeply into both points of view.
On the one hand, when it comes to economy, every one inevitably would consider it as an effective factor that has direct link with the people’s life. Therefore, it is widely announced by scholars that boost to the economy would readily bring welfare to people life. For example, a research conducted by X University manifestly illustrated that the proportion of the employment had a swift escalation by growth of economy in X in 2016. Although this progress would cause relief in the individual life in case of financial supports, it could not guarantee the other aspects of the life.
On the other hand, in favor of second group, they state that there are other issues aligned with economy that are substantially considered as remarkable aims of the countries. Not only should nations take advantage of the cultural improvement, but an increase in the literacy is also a mandatory target. Reportedly, it is generally said by sociologists that countries would not meet other goals without acquisition of fair number of well-educated citizens. For instance, according to the global survey of the X University, sixty percent of the nations that their educated individuals exceeds seventy percent of their population benefit satisfactory economic condition.
To sum up, it would be distinctively wise if government pays more attention to all important aspects of the nations development. Not only should economic achievement take into account, but other criteria such as culture and education should improve annually.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
Undoubtedly, these days economy plays an immense role in govern...
^^^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...tention to all important aspects of the nations development. Not only should economic a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, second, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22188449848 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88714762999 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586626139818 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.588732872 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.714285714 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119776103025 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351861330935 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0249780501325 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0668489901407 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179157764263 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.