Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission outweigh the disadvantages?
Museums open new doors of knowledge and awareness to the people. While some have a conviction that entrance fee should be applied in the museums, others believe that the cons of charging the visitors are far more than its pros. This essay will elaborate the merits and drawbacks of this viewpoints, and I think in spite of some disadvantages, admission fee has to be paid.
First and foremost, entrance charges are a good financial source to compensate museums expenditures. Undoubtedly, preservation of the museums, including maintaining of its building to keeping the historical stuffs in specific circumstances, costs significant amount of money. As the government give tax from the citizens to present them better services, entrance fee enables museums to provide better and constant facilities for the visitors and even for the next generation. According a survey has been conducted at Harvard University, the explicit expenses of museums equal to the one-third of the total cost of a city with approximately 1 million residents.
To support the seconds standpoint, some people may not afford the admission charges. Inevitably, class distinction impulses some limitation to the lower bracket income of the society so that they have been deprived from receiving particular services. This discrimination is not limited to museum fees and it spread throughout various level of lives such as medical insurance, social services and even education facilities. Therefore, if governments would have a plan for these obstacles, these vulnerable people could have been able to utilize such services.
On the basis of the points mentioned above, although the adverse consequences of museums’ admission fee can bring some disadvantages, its beneficial is necessary to assist retaining this precious industry.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 283, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...l elaborate the merits and drawbacks of this viewpoints, and I think in spite of som...
^^^^
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'seconds'' or 'second's'?
Suggestion: seconds'; second's
...y 1 million residents. To support the seconds standpoint, some people may not afford ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, while, as to, i think, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51798561151 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07424348979 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636690647482 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4884243858 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.833333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192250010708 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624227381469 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413353998142 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104349329914 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253165845849 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.