Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones. However, others think oppositely. Discuss both views and give your opinion ?
The importance of preserving old buildings which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial Influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion the both conflicting views appear to be rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive as well as negative impacts of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
Analyzing the statement and explaining further, the first and the foremost reason behind this is that preserving old buildings mean we are protecting our culture. Young generation specially visit these historical building like forts, museums and places and they get a lot of knowledge about their culture, history and the lifestyle of our ancestors, kings and queens, patriots and martyrs. Another striking benefit in this regard is that preserving old buildings help to attract tourists and get business out of them. These tourists visit pay for entry fees, do shopping in the local area and even employment gets generated in the nearby areas of old buildings. Categorically discussing, It cannot be Ignored that the main reason behind this is that old buildings also preserve old art and many scholars, researchers have interest in these arts forms as they want to learn it and preserve it.
Probing ahead, one of the main underlying reason stems from the fact is that some old buildings are almost fully damaged so preserving them is of no use and it is rather better to make new constructions for people who are homeless, for building more hospital as well as schools. Moving further, it is pertinent to mention that preservation of old buildings require a lot of money and labor which could be better used for fulfilling the needs of existing population and these places can be used for building markets and other important public buildings. Apart from the reasons mentioned above it can be clearly stated why I am also against of this trend.
To recapitulate, according to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits and drawbacks of preserving old and building new buildings are indeed too genuine to be ignored.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, thus, well, while, apart from, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09866666667 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77012121676 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562666666667 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.127092743 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.076923077 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8461538462 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179266116044 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692538491991 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043588157546 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111556312495 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00363547506525 0.056905535591 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.