Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods.
To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal?
As the world evolves, a large number of societies confront different challenges. Hence, a contentious dispute has been provoked over whether maximizing production should be the primary aim of every country. In my opinion, it seems to me that this paradigm can be beneficial, but it is not the optimal choice to be an expedient aim.
To begin with the positives, producing more merchandise can bring a few merits, though. To enumerate, the number of the population is surging radically which conduce to growing their needs. Thus, to meet people’s demand, production should be increased. For example, the population census in China is skyrocketing, so that rising the production is inevitable in order to cater their significant needs. As a result, if a country produces fewer materials, the growing demands could not be satisfied.
However, although raising the production could have merits, the demerits cannot be overlooked. When the production increases, the quantity of a good supplied might exceed the demand that leads to excess supplies. Therefore, economic depression is the adverse consequence of excess supplies, and this poses a credible threat to the community. Moreover, one of this serious repercussion is the inequality in the distribution of wealth resulting in not only prevalence of impoverishment but also a shift in the caste system as thumper echelon of society descend to the lower class. Accordingly, increasing production contributes to the economic downturn.
In conclusion, whilst producing more commodities has benefits, of which catering the continuing needs of societies is the most apparent, it has drawbacks, the most apparent is economic depression. I disagree that maximizing production is the ideal objective.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
As the world evolves, a large number of societies confront different challenges...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51481481481 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16293910998 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6857104 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178729409576 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584559253206 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474914484507 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992157901608 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282313574568 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.