Majority of people reckon teachers as the best guiders for school children when it comes to justice and etiquette, while others believe that they should focus on their academic subjects. From my perspective, teachers should merely explain their field and leave moral lessons to parents.
From one standpoint, there are several reasons why teachers should help children to grasp what is right and what is wrong. Firstly, if a child's parents do not pay enough attention to their kid, then he will have insufficient knowledge about the world where he lives. For example, basic knowledge about etiquette or unspoken rules will be unknown, thus teachers should help the child to be aware of diverse things. Secondly, class is a small group of society, where everyone should appropriately conduct himself. For teacher it is more easier to explain the suitable behaviour in such conditions than for parents and friends.
On the other hand, pedagogue can not be an appropriate guider for children, since what is considered to be bad or god depends on individual's opinion. For example, just ten years ago being gay was considered to be bad, however currently society already reckon it as normal thing. If a teacher with an old views will teach children that being gay is bad, the she definitely mislead them. In addition, spending time on children's behaviour and talks about justice will take a lot of energy from tutor. As a result, he will be less efficacious on teaching own subject which then affects students' understanding of it and afterwards worsen his marks.
In conclusion, i believe that teachers have no need on explaining everything to the children, so other parts from their domain should belong to the parents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 531, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...tely conduct himself. For teacher it is more easier to explain the suitable behaviour in su...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... considered to be bad or god depends on individuals opinion. For example, just ten years ag...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'she'?
Suggestion: the; she
...l teach children that being gay is bad, the she definitely mislead them. In addition, s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'misleads'.
Suggestion: misleads
...at being gay is bad, the she definitely mislead them. In addition, spending time on chi...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 16, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ards worsen his marks. In conclusion, i believe that teachers have no need on e...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03157894737 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6377611593 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617543859649 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.1064007963 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.307692308 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8461538462 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253313648298 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904388084876 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608751958925 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157910940471 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437382354605 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.