Many people think that the government should spend money to outer space, while others believe that it’s a waste of public money.
Discuss both views and include your own opinion.
In recent years, there is a common phenomenon that governments invest a massive amount of money in space industry. The issues of whether it is a waste of money or not remains a source of controversy. While there is a strong case for the latter view, I am more inclined to the former.
Those in favour of this policy may state that this strategy would bring two main advantages. The first and foremost rationale they may argue is that this would offer an alternative solution to overpopulation. As we might discover another life-bearing planet in outer space, Earth inhabitants can migrate there, alleviating overcrowding. A further noticeable advantage of space industry is that we might be capable of witnessing a superior alien civilisation, which enables us to expand our knowledges about universe. This would also mean that we can develop our new technologies based on theirs. For instance, we can finally understand how to manipulate gravitation and build futuristic gadgets such as flying cars.
On the other hand, I find it more convincing to believe that funding space research has its detrimental effects. First of all, it take years and millions of dollars to construct a spacecraft and then launch it onto the universe. Instead, we should sharpen our focus on pressing issues of the Earth such as developing infrastructure and facilities. Another drawback of space travelling lies in its huge initial cost as this newly-emerging industry requires an enormous investment from both enterprises and governments.
In conclusion, although it is undeniable that space industry brings benefit to the whole society, I am more inclined to the view that we should focus on confronting our current problems instead.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'believing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'convince' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: believing
...e other hand, I find it more convincing to believe that funding space research has its det...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'takes'?
Suggestion: takes
...s detrimental effects. First of all, it take years and millions of dollars to constr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, may, so, then, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21223021583 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0403259879 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615107913669 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5886173326 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138056756154 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469700945768 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047128933582 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951701795478 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634325114218 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.