Modern buildings change the character and apperance of town and cities. The government should insist and new buildings can be built in traditional styles to protect cultural identity. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is certainly true that too keep alive our culture than we must have to prootect it. Today's modern bulidings changes the style and strcture of cities and town in all over the world. The government have to take a steps for protect culture to transform new bulidings into traditional style. I disagree with this phenomenon.
To begin with, Culture and tradition is the image of particular country. There is a plethora of historical temples and places where people can visit and get a humble knowlege about culture. Infact some of new buildings are also can be bulit in traditional avtar. Our past generation may be thinks that 'old is gold' and theie mentality can be never change. They are keep protecting in whatever way they can.
However, I believe that making a new modern buildings can't changes the culture and history. Infact in this global era, The government can built a new building that can be mixure of our tradition and using new technology. This is the best way to keep alive traditional style and cultural identity of new buildings. As fast pace of life, it is also good to not look back and accept a new cultural changes.
Moreover, New buildings should not be designed in the old styles, But it can be built using new design to match the new technology, new functions and new locations of buliding. This new traditional architecture, It should be considered as more superior and fantastic. Regular repairs or refurbishment for historiacal building. For instance, It may be a good idea to keep the country's cultural values alive longer.
In the conclusion, From all aforementioned points, I hole my view that, To protect cultural identity the government should take other steps and modern buildings can be built as a mixure of new and old styles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to keep'?
Suggestion: to keep
It is certainly true that too keep alive our culture than we must have to ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a step' or simply 'steps'?
Suggestion: a step; steps
... the world. The government have to take a steps for protect culture to transform new bu...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ieve that making a new modern buildings cant changes the culture and history. Infact...
^^^^
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'change'?
Suggestion: change
...not look back and accept a new cultural changes. Moreover, New buildings should not ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...riacal building. For instance, It may be a good idea to keep the countrys cultura...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85148514851 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73994981522 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508250825083 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.551750202 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.6666666667 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8333333333 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42851900413 0.244688304435 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132092021 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899882419209 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255647740299 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529498606743 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.