More and more companies are allowing employees to work from home. DO you think this is a positive or negative development?
In recent years, there is a growing trend that many employees are allowed to stay at home to work. Although this appears advantageous in the digital era like at the present, I believe that the drawbacks of distance working are far more significant.
There are several reasons why working from home is beneficial. First, as it is a form of social distancing, it can prevent the spread of contagious diseases and keep people safe. For example, the Coronavirus, which causes the Covid-19 pandemic all around the world, can be transmitted easily due to human interactions, so staying home for work may be one of the best precautions that stop the virus from diffusing. Second, working at home also save employees a great deal of time for preparation. Workers do not need to wake up early to hurry for buses or trains, or females do not need to spend time doing the makeup of they work in distance. As a result, employees can have more time for their jobs, which may lead to higher productivity.
However, I would argue that the trend will bring disadvantages in the long term. First, not meeting people for a long time can reduce the quality of interpersonal communication skills of workers. The lack of intimate face-to-face conversations among people in the company can lead to unexpected misunderstandings, which may have a negative impact on relationships among them. Second, working using digital devices connected with the Internet, such as laptops or phones, could cause a shortage of working motivation to people. This is because, without the supervision of bosses like working in the offices, workers may not be motivated and may easily fall into the temptation of the Internet with many interesting social networking sites like Facebook or Instagram and delay working.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the advantages of remote working are overshadowed by its drawbacks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, second, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01277955272 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95762793546 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575079872204 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5003217494 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.071428571 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235572586801 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771960569581 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572309497098 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132293432714 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755519433491 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.