More and more people are expected to be living in the urban centres in the future What problems can be caused Should government encourage people to settle outside the city

Essay topics:

More and more people are expected to be living in the urban centres in the future. What problems can be caused? Should government encourage people to settle outside the city?

In modern times, an increased amount of people is migrating to the cities. This influx is going to be continued in the coming years, making urbanisation a pervasive issue. In this essay I will examine the problems caused by this, and explain why I feel that governments should lure people to be stablished in the countryside.

There are many problems linked to urbanisation, but the most significant one is related to the environment. Whereas currently, there is a collective effort to tackle the environmental problems in the urban areas, in the future they will be increased because of the continuing emigration of people in the city centres. More residents in a big city means more cars to commute from one place to another, resulting in traffic congestion. This results in a sheer amount of greenhouse gases emitted by the vehicles, provoking inimical effects to the atmosphere and ultimately to the environment. In other words, cities are the biggest polluters of the environment, and if people continue to migrate in the cities, the mitigation of pollution will be unfeasible.

Clearly, there is a dire need to deal with pollution in the city centres. Governments, and especially local authorities, should encourage people dwell back in the countryside. If governments inform citizens about the issues that stem from their decisions to be permanent residents of the urban centres, they will raise awareness and motivate them to migrate back to the rural areas, or even in the outskirts of cities. This could be possible by campaigns, for instance, related to the benefits of living in the countryside, or even alluring state aid to build new houses outside the city. Unless governments take the responsibility to eliminate the environmental problems caused by the increased number of cars, the air pollution and its effects to the environment will not be limited. Obviously, state authorities have the power to enhance citizens to live in the countryside.

In conclusion, the possible problems connected to the migration of people to the urban areas are unimaginable, with the most significant one the environmental pollution. To tackle this, governments should encourage people to leave cities and transmigrate to the countryside.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le to be stablished in the countryside. There are many problems linked to urbani...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'mean'?
Suggestion: mean
...y centres. More residents in a big city means more cars to commute from one place to ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 757, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gation of pollution will be unfeasible. Clearly, there is a dire need to deal wi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 879, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce citizens to live in the countryside. In conclusion, the possible problems con...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, well, whereas, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29247910864 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11019718942 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487465181058 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1728059373 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.75 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4375 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6875 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347943992401 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10822276944 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678612320383 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218873284551 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00857421531833 0.056905535591 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.