More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses for communities in poorer countries. What are the reasons for this? Who benefits more from this, the communities or these young people?
There are a growing concern that youngsters in developed countries have a tendency to do charity jobs in developing nations in recent years. In my opinion, there are a variety reasons for this issue, and young generation will have more advantages than communities.
To begin with, this phenomenon can be attributable to two principal factors. One of the most obvious reasons is that young adults could gain experiences by doing unpaid jobs. In other words, they would be more mature when teaching or constructing houses for inhabitant in rural areas. For example, if young men and women dream to be a...
Subscribe as testbig VIP readers and get unlimited access to essays on the top list.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 29, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'argued'.
Suggestion: argued
...arity job. In conclusion, it is widely argue that doing unsalaried jobs in develop...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dely argue that doing unsalaried jobs in developing countries by young adults in...
^^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... jobs in developing countries by young adults in affluent nations is more popul...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, in my opinion, in other words, in spite of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99683544304 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76655951431 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560126582278 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3350988304 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.125 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214837934932 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708272206949 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623443733838 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121129566224 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513653295597 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.