New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages?
Children living in some countries currently choose to stick with electric devices in their free time. I accept that this tendency has some benefits, I also believe that its potential problems are more significant.
On the one hand, there are some positive impacts of young people accessing to technology. The first benefit is that children may find it interesting to gain in-depth knowledge about technology. Since they have a grasp of technological knowledge, the youths tend to become a scientist, or an engineer in the future. This is likely to have an important role in solving the lack of people working in these fields in many parts of the world. In addition, children taking part in activities related to technology at home may decrease the risk of facing with troubles and society’s vices outside. For example, offspring do not have to worry about hitting by vehicles on the roads, if they just play games or watch television in their house.
On the other hand, I believe that the benefits are outweighed by the drawbacks. Firstly, the rate of people wearing glasses or contacts in the early ages is extremely high in many nations. By overusing eyes and concentrating for hours on computer or television’s screens, children may deal with Eyestrain and short-sighted eyes. As a result, they need glasses to correct their vision. Secondly, spending too much time on technological devices can hold young individuals back from gaining communication and social skills which are indispensable skills when they grow up. Therefore, this has detrimental effects not only on their eye health, but also on their future.
In conclusion, I admit that there are some benefits of children accessing technology. However, I believe the negative impacts are more significant.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18402777778 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95802155047 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597222222222 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.528381168 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3125 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3125 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223724568135 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604281517226 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442630128604 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118794997967 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468953623095 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.