Nowadays information is freely available on internet, therefore is no longer need for museum. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
Today, people may say that human has arrived closely to the future. A future that is dreamed by all people that knowledge may be accessed trough a tube and mini-square-compact device which could be handled by our hand. Yes, it is true now, the technology that behaves as a bridge between the idea and inanimate object is called, today, by the internet. Sadly, the invention of the internet somehow depresses the prevalence of using museum as a source of knowledge.
Truthfully, both are having a similar appliance, displaying historical objects, but eventually having a very distinctive way to consume it. Firstly, students may need to drive over 10 miles away to attend a museum, and when they arrived at the place, luckily, a long journey had been paid by seeing a beautiful artefact. However, the knowledge that stayed at the object cannot be obtained immediately, they have to extract it by giving an interpretation. Furthermore, the effort of acquiring does not stop on that. They need to write down on a paper as what they conceive it. In my opinion, those are such a long way to acquire a knowledge.
Those exhausted efforts of getting knowledge are minimised by the internet. Pupils are no longer traveling in a great distance, they just sit at a home's chair nicely, grab the phone over the hand, and start to browse an archaeological artefact. Those are the privilege that museum cannot serve.
In the last past of these arguments, I would suggest that even though a museum has a drawback, the owners should not daunt about their institution due to the fact that the article-related artefact will not be written if the raw material from museum does not exist. Lastly, the internet only a window shows actual scene from the world, and the world itself consists in a museum
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 628, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'knowledge'.
Suggestion: knowledge
...n, those are such a long way to acquire a knowledge. Those exhausted efforts of getting kn...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd the world itself consists in a museum
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, may, so, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8431372549 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82206903652 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601307189542 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9454319698 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11279608614 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351290669354 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309952131246 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0655795968779 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0167556106578 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.