Nowadays, many families have both parents working. Some working parents believe other family members like grandparents can take care of their children, while others think childcare centres provide the best care. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
As a result of a busy and modern lifestyle, full-time working parents have not much time to look after their offspring. While some working parents choose to send their children to childcare centres , I would argue that young kids who are cared by grandparents should be prioritized.
On the one hand, childcare services are popular with working parents due to several reasons. Firstly, it organizes professionally about timetables, foods, activities and so on to develop children's physical and mental. For example, daily menus have full of nutrients, and each day has different dishes which allow children to have attractive meals. Secondly, kids who usually interact with their fellows enhance not only their language and communication skills but also their sense of community. They may not feel lonely because of having many friends beside.
On the other hand, I believe that allowing grandparents to look after their grandchildren at home is a better option . The first advantage is that children are focused care and love without sharing other children. For instance, children are easily found to suffer from illness or injury by their grandparents and are then given to doctors soon. Secondly, it is very likely that young children cared by grandparents throughout their childhood will appreciate family values when they grow. They can become dutiful people in their family.
For the reasons mentioned above, I would strongly recommend that children be looked after by grandparents at home. If grandparents are in a distant location or unable to do childcare , young children should be sent to childcare centres.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...send their children to childcare centres , I would argue that young kids who are c...
^^
Line 2, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...one hand, childcare services are popular with working parents due to several reas...
^^
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that allowing grandparents to look after their grandchildren at home is a better ...
^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...grandchildren at home is a better option . The first advantage is that children ...
^^
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...randchildren at home is a better option . The first advantage is that children a...
^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s a better option . The first advantage is that children are focused care and lo...
^^
Line 3, column 521, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hey grow. They can become dutiful people in their family. For the reasons mentio...
^^
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...stant location or unable to do childcare , young children should be sent to childc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30350194553 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78137029359 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630350194553 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9462102812 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3571428571 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294323854128 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952074446503 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602771703919 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171548624207 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694217607883 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.