Nowadays, more and more young people hold the important positions in the government. Some people think that is a good thing while others argue that it is not suitable. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Youngsters are bound to be involved more in politics. While some people argue that the young should not be handed vital places in the government, it seems to me that there are more merits to let them join the government.
On the one hand, there are various reasons why it can be argued that young people should not hold the fundamental positions in the government. Firstly, the elderly people think youngsters lack the necessary qualifications to conduct that complex mission of the government. For example, it is common for people to take years studying law in order to get knowledge and degrees which suffice for a position in legislative branch. Secondly, the young tend to be in shortage of practical experiences. If they have not faced challenges, they are likely to make mistakes which has considerable impacts on the community.
On the other hand, I am of the idea that youngsters should be part of the government. Perhaps the principle reason is that young people are considered more creative and decisive than people of older ages. As a result, they can clear up problems with much flexibility, which can create innovative breakthrough policies. Furthermore, youngsters have long period of time to dedicate to their nations. As a clear illustration, with the similar qualifications and abilities, the younger people are likely to get much promotion rather than their older counterparts because of their longer anticipated time of devotion to puclic service in the future.
In conclusion, although both views have their own advantages, it seems to me that young people should be selected to play vital roles in the government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'parted'?
Suggestion: parted
...m of the idea that youngsters should be part of the government. Perhaps the principl...
^^^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...cies. Furthermore, youngsters have long period of time to dedicate to their nations. As a clea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in short, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10780669145 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91183684732 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53531598513 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5586328926 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.692307692 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278072918599 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972336520635 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865647901304 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182809541414 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495435782592 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.