Nowadays more and more young people hold the important positions in the government. Some people think that it is a good thing,while others argue that it is not suitable.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It is true that the number of youngsters holding important positions in the government is growing in these days. I would argue that this trend could have both negative and positive consequences in equal measure.
On the one hand, this trend has some notable drawbacks. The bottom line is that young leaders usually face difficulties in leading older people who work longer than them. In Eastern countries, for example, young talents are often not recognised their leadership. They are usually thought to have insufficient capabilities to manage all aspects of policy as the economy or international affairs. Moreover, all of them is short of real experience. They may face fewer challenges in their career so that they are likely to easily make vital mistakes, which can affect badly to the public.
On the other hand, all above arguments cannot demonstrate that young people are unable to occupy important positions in the government. Firstly, it is undeniable that their youth is a huge advantage which enables them to be creative and up-to-date. This may result in many breakthrough innovations and styles in managing policies. Secondly, it is apparent that young people have a longer period of working time to contribute to their nation. An illustration can be seen is that the same the qualification or certificate they are more likely to be elected rather than older counterparts because of his longer anticipated time of devotion to public service in the future.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the rise in the number of young people working on important positions has advantageous and disadvantageous effects to the society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17228464419 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92488022355 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576779026217 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2260314616 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6428571429 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173166198941 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566130693607 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570308677296 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111862982151 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317630740758 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.